After mere weeks in the market, Tropicana is discontinuing packaging introduced in January, and reverting to its previous design (see below).
The reversal comes on the heels of consumer complaints that disparaged the new design and clamored for a return of the original look.
According to an article in The New York Times, people described the new packaging as “ugly” or “stupid,” and resembling “a generic bargain brand” or a “store brand.” Others described the redesign as making it more difficult to distinguish among the varieties of Tropicana juices.
Tropicana is yielding to public opinion not because of the volume of compaints (they are supposedly limited overall) but because they came from loyal consumers according to Neil Campbell, president at Tropicana North America.
“We underestimated the deep emotional bond” they had with the original packaging, Campbell stated. “Those consumers are very important to us, so we responded.”
“What we didn’t get was the passion this very loyal small group of consumers have. That wasn’t something that came out in the research,” said Campbell.
“I’m incredibly surprised by the reaction,” said Peter Arnell, chairman of Arnell Group, the firm that conceived Tropicana's new packaging.
Since Campbell and Arnell were blind to core brand equities and consumers' emotional attachments to them, the push for the package redesign must have started someplace artificial, someplace other than the marketplace. Research is often used to validate pre-existing hypotheses and that seems to be the case here. Otherwise these experienced, well-paid people would not have so grossly misread Tropicana's brand franchise.